The Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion (JCMRO) follows a transparent, rigorous, and unbiased editorial and peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality scientific research in accordance with COPE and ICMJE guidelines.

Peer Review Model

The journal operates a double-blind peer review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure impartial evaluation.

Initial Editorial Screening

All submitted manuscripts are initially screened by the editorial office to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, and compliance with submission guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the required standards may be rejected without external review.

Plagiarism and Ethical Check

All manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection tools. Submissions with significant similarity or ethical concerns, including lack of ethical approval or conflicts of interest, are rejected.

Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to an editor and sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.

Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, scientific validity, methodology, clarity of presentation, relevance to the journal, and adherence to ethical standards.

Review Timeline

The peer review process is typically completed within 6–7 weeks from submission. Authors are informed promptly regarding editorial decisions and revision requirements.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback. They must maintain confidentiality, declare conflicts of interest, and must not use unpublished material for personal benefit.

Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editor may decide to accept, request minor or major revisions, or reject the manuscript. The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

Revision and Final Decision

Authors must respond to reviewer comments and submit revised manuscripts within the specified time. Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by reviewers before a final decision is made.

Confidentiality

All submitted manuscripts and reviewer comments are treated as confidential and are not disclosed to any third party outside the editorial process.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based solely on scientific merit, originality, and relevance. Decisions are not influenced by article processing charges, sponsorship, or commercial interests.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing a justified explanation. All appeals and complaints are handled in accordance with COPE guidelines to ensure fairness and transparency.

Publication

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, formatting, and proofing before publication. All articles are published online with DOI assignment and are made accessible to the global research community.