Investigating Streptococcus pyogenes-Produced Bioactive Secondary Metabolites by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Evaluating Its Antimicrobial Effects
Abstract
Background:
With a prevalence of 15% to 30% in paediatric pharyngitis, Streptococcus pyogenesis is the most prevalent and consequential bacterial cause of this condition. Although the typical laboratory test for microbiologic confirmation of pharyngitis involves growing a culture from a throat swab specimen, this process takes a long time and means that adequate therapy is delayed. S. pyogenes pharyngitis can cause both immediate and long-term problems if not addressed. Here, we detailed the volatile metabolomes of Staphylococcus pyogenes and related oropharyngeal colonising bacteria. We present evidence to back future breath-based diagnostic testing for streptococcal pharyngitis and propose potential biomarkers that differentiate S. pyogenes from other species. Cellular activity, maintenance, and growth rely on metabolites, which are tiny molecules that take part in metabolic activities. Metabolites typically have concentrations spanning multiple orders of magnitude and a molecular weight ranging from 50 to 1500 Da. Metabolite sensitivity to many environmental factors contributes to the metabolome's high degree of dynamic and time-dependent nature.
Aims and Objectives:
The researchers in this lab set out to identify the antibacterial bioactivity of Streptococcus pyogenes's chemical components and learn more about their biological activity.
Method:
Isolation of Streptococcus pyogenes was accomplished by collecting swabs from children afflicted with streptococcal pharyngitis at Babylon Hospital for Women and Children. Following incubation of the samples in stationary culture at 37°C for 24 hours, headspace samples were taken. Every bacterial species was cultured in the same glassware using the same medium. Analysis and concentration of volatile substances: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to concentrate and separate volatile metabolites. The biological components, sometimes known as bioactive chemicals, were examined in this study using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) methods. On top of that, an experimental laboratory was used to assess the efficacy of Streptococcus pyogenes's ethanolic extract against microorganisms.
Results:
We experimentally identified the presence of the following bioactive components using GC-MS analysis on Streptococcus pyogenes: 3-Methylbutyraldehyde, 1,1-Dimethoxynonane, 2-Ethyl-1-butanol, 2,2'-Diaminodiethylamine, diethyl 2-(aminomethylene)malonate, N-ethenylmethanimine, Pyrazine, 2,5-diethyl, 5-Ethyl-2,3-dimethylpyrazine, 4H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridin-4-one, 2,6-Dimethyl-1-heptene, 2-Nonanone, 5-ethyl. Streptococcus pyogenes was tested for its potential antibacterial effects against five harmful bacteria by analysing its secondary metabolites. This study looked at five distinct infections and how effectively the standard antibiotics AM-Amikacin and CTX-Cefotaxime worked, in comparison to an ethanolic extract of Streptococcus pyogenes. Enterococcus faecalis (16.00±0.32, 26.09±0.25, and 20.71±0.24), Escherichia coli (13.60±0.18, 19.54±0.22, and 17.00±0.20), Bacillus subtilis (17.81±0.20, 21.00±0.23, and 22.64±0.24), Proteus mirabilis (21.65±0.23, 28.07±0.25, and 25.00±0.24), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (19.00±0.22, 24.07±0.25, and 21.89±0.20). Streptococcus pyogenes metabolites were shown to show remarkable activity against Proteus mirabilis, with a mean value of (21.65±0.23).
Full text article
References
Hettinga KA, van Valenberg HJF, Lam TJGM, van Hooijdonk ACM. 2008. Detection of mastitis pathogens by analysis of volatile bacterial metabolites. J Dairy Sci 91:3834–3839.
Tait E, Perry JD, Stanforth SP, Dean JR. 2014. Use of volatile compounds as a diagnostic tool for the detection of pathogenic bacteria. TrAC Trends Analytic Chem 53:117–125.
Bos LDJ, Sterk PJ, Schultz MJ. 2013. Volatile metabolites of pathogens: a systematic review. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003311.
Cox CD, Parker J. 1979. Use of 2-aminoacetophenone production in identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol 9:479–484.
Newton WA, Snell EE. 1965. Formation and interrelationships of tryptophanase and tryptophan synthetases in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 89:355–364.
Bean HD, Dimandja JMD, Hill JE. 2012. Bacterial volatile discovery using solid phase microextraction and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 901:41–46.
Berna AZ, McCarthy JS, Wang RX, Saliba KJ, Bravo FG, Cassells J, Padovan B, Trowell SC. 2015. Analysis of breath specimens for biomarkers of Plasmodium falciparum infection. J Infect Dis 212:1120–1128.
Schaber CL, Katta N, Bollinger LB, Mwale M, Mlotha-Mitole R, Trehan I, Raman B, Odom John AR. 2018. Breathprinting reveals malariaassociated biomarkers and mosquito attractants. J Infect Dis 217:1553– 1560.
Wilson AD, Baietto M. 2011. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors 11:1105–1176.
Phillips M, Basa-Dalay V, Blais J. 2012. Point-of-care breath test for biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 92:314–320.
McFarland M, Szasz TP, Zhou JY, Motley K, Sivapalan JS, Isaacson-Schmid M, Todd EM, Hogan PG, Fritz SA, Burnham C-A, Hoffmann S, Morley SC. 2017. Colonization with 19F and other pneumococcal conjugate vaccine serotypes in children in St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Vaccine 35:4389–4395.
Lanie JA, Ng WL, Kazmierczak KM, Andrzejewski TM, Davidsen TM, Wayne KJ, Tettelin H, Glass JI, Winkler ME. 2007. Genome sequence of avery’s virulent serotype 2 strain D39 of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with that of unencapsulated laboratory strain R6. J Bacteriol 189:38–51.
Wang XR, Cassells J, Berna AZ. 2018. Stability control for breath analysis using GC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1097– 1098:27–34.
Tautenhahn R, Patti GJ, Rinehart D, Siuzdak G. 2012. XCMS online: a webbased platform to process untargeted metabolomic data. Anal Chem 84:5035–5039.
Metsalu T, Vilo J. 2015. Clustvis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W566–70.
Nizio KD, Perrault KA, Troobnikoff AN, Ueland M, Shoma S, Iredell JR, Middleton PG, Forbes SL. 2016. In vitro volatile organic compound profiling using GC x GC-TOFMS to differentiate bacteria associated with lung infections: a proof-of-concept study. J Breath Res 10:026008.
Phan J, Meinardi S, Barletta B, Blake DR, Whiteson K. 2017. Stable Isotope profiles reveal active production of vocs from human-associated microbes. J Breath Res 11:017101.
Hosmer J, McEwan AG, Kappler U. 2023. Bacterial acetate metabolism and its influence on human epithelia. Emerg Top Life Sci:ETLS20220092.
Zhang B, Hu S, Baskin E, Patt A, Siddiqui JK, Mathé EA. 2018. RaMP: a comprehensive relational database of metabolomics pathways for pathway enrichment analysis of genes and metabolites. Metabolites 8:16.
Amann A, Costello B de L, Miekisch W, Schubert J, Buszewski B, Pleil J, Ratcliffe N, Risby T. 2014. The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (vocs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. J Breath Res 8:034001.
Dolch ME, Hornuss C, Klocke C, Praun S, Villinger J, Denzer W, Schelling G, Schubert S. 2012. Volatile compound profiling for the identification of gram-negative bacteria by ion-molecule reaction–mass spectrometry. J Appl Microbiol 113:1097–1105.
Thorn RMS, Reynolds DM, Greenman J. 2011. Multivariate analysis of bacterial volatile compound profiles for discrimination between selected species and strains In vitro. J Microbiol Met 84:258–264.
Traxler S, Barkowsky G, Saß R, Klemenz A-C, Patenge N, Kreikemeyer B, Schubert JK, Miekisch W. 2019. Volatile scents of influenza A and S. Pyogenes (co-)infected cells. Sci Rep 9:18894.
Bingol, K.; Bruschweiler-Li, L.; Yu, C.; Somogyi, A.; Zhang, F.; Brüschweiler, R. Metabolomics beyond spectroscopic databases: A combined MS/NMR strategy for the rapid identification of new metabolites in complex mixtures. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3864–3870.
Veuthey, J.-L.; Guillarme, D.; Schoenmakers, P.J. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in metabolomics research: Mass analyzers in ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupling. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1292, 51–65.
Ichou, F.; Schwarzenberg, A. Comparison of the activation time effects and the internal energy distributions for the CID, PQD and HCD excitation modes. J. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 49, 498–508.
Sleno, L.; Volmer, D.A. Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39, 1091–1112.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.