Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy Techniques: Cellular Targeted Radiation Therapy with Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitizing Drug Delivery to Tumours and GNRT

Murtada Sameer Sadoon Kazim (1) , Muntadher Ayad Fadhil Thabit (2) , Ahmed Khalil Wadi Abdulla (3) , Khazaal Mhmood Saadoon (4)
(1) Al-Hilla University College, Applied Medical Physics Department, Iraq , Iraq
(2) Al-Mustaqbal University, Department of Medical Physics, Iraq , Iraq
(3) University of Mosul, Department of Biophysics, Iraq , Iraq
(4) Al-Hilla University College, Department of Medical Physics, Iraq , Iraq

Abstract

For cancer patients, radiotherapy has proved a lifesaver. Innovations in the biological, engineering, and physical sciences gave rise to and advanced the subject. Continual incorporation of innovations from different domains is crucial to the advancement of radiation oncology. Nanomedicine is a very young scientific field with the potential to influence radiation oncology. Nanoscale materials are ideal for use in radiation oncology because to their numerous desirable characteristics, including improved permeability, retention effect, and superparamagnetism. Radiation therapy for cancer often falls short of expectations due to several limitations. Normal tissues are also at risk from radiation therapy, which is why it is not used as a focused anticancer treatment. Radiation treatment is often unsuccessful because tumours have characteristics that make them resistant. Because of their ability to interact directly with ionising radiation, a number of nanoparticles have demonstrated the potential to improve the feasibility of radiation treatment by increasing cellular radiation sensitivity. Nanoparticles made of metal, quantum dots, silica, polymeric materials, etc., have all been studied for their potential as radio-sensitizers, with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of radiation therapy and overcoming radio-resistance. The use of nanoparticles to improve and enhance radiation therapy for cancer treatment still faces significant obstacles, despite all the research and development in the field. Problems in guaranteeing large-scale production of nanoparticles with enhanced characterizations and specific biological obstacles limit their potential uses as radiosensitizers. Enhancing the treatment is possible by resolving the issues with nanoparticles, such as pharmacokinetics and physical/chemical characterisation. Further research into nanoparticles and their therapeutic effects could pave the way for the creation of radiation treatments based on nanotechnology that effectively combat a range of malignancies in the years to come.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Chang, M. Y. et al. 2008. Increased apoptotic potential and dose- enhancing effect of gold nanoparticles in combination with single-dose clinical electron beams on tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Science 99(7):1479–1484.

Cho, S. H., B. L. Jones, and S. Krishnan. 2009. The dosimetric feasibility of gold nanoparticle-aided radiation therapy (GNRT) via brachytherapy using low-energy gamma-/x-ray sources. Physics in Medicine and Biology 54(16):4889–4905.

Briggs, B. et al. 2011. Photosensitization by iodinated DNA minor groove binding ligands: Evaluation of DNA double-strand break induction and repair. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B 103(2):145–152.

Butterworth, K. T. et al. 2010. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and radiation enhancement using 1.9 nm gold particles: Potential application for cancer therapy. Nanotechnology 21(29):295101.

Colon, J. et al. 2009. Protection from radiation-induced pneumonitis using cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 5(2):225–231.

Dvorak, H. F. et al. 1988. Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. American Journal of Pathology 133(1):95–109.

Bouchat, V. et al. 2007. Radioimmunotherapy with radioactive nanoparticles: First results of dosimetry for vascularized and necrosed solid tumors. Medical Physics 34(11): 4504–4513.

Garnica-Garza, H. M. 2009. Contrast-enhanced radiotherapy: Feasibility and characteristics of the physical absorbed dose distribution for deep-seated tumors. Physics in Medicine and Biology 54(18):5411–5425. #

Goorley, T., R. Zamenhof, and H. Nikjoo. 2004. Calculated DNA damage from gadolinium Auger electrons and relation to dose distributions in a head phantom. International Journal of Radiation Biology 80(11–12):933–940.

Hainfeld, J. F., D. N. Slatkin, and H. M. Smilowitz. 2004. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Physics in Medicine and Biology 49(18):N309–N315.

Hamoudeh, M. et al. 2008a. Holmium-loaded PLLA nanopar- ticles for intratumoral radiotherapy via the TMT technique: Preparation, characterization, and stability evaluation after neutron irradiation. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 34(8):796–806.

Hamoudeh, M. et al. 2008b. Radionuclides delivery systems for nuclear imaging and radiotherapy of cancer. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 60(12):1329–1346. Herold, D. M. et al. 2000. Gold microspheres: A selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement. International Journal of Radiation Biology 76(10):1357–1364.

Jain, P. K. et al. 2008. Noble metals on the nanoscale: Optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Accounts of Chemical Research 41(12):1578–1586.

Jain, S. et al. 2011. Cell-specific radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles at megavoltage radiation energies. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 79(2): 531–539

Jin, C. et al. 2007. Radiosensitization of paclitaxel, etanidazole and paclitaxel+etanidazole nanoparticles on hypoxic human tumor cells in vitro. Biomaterials 28(25): 3724–3730.

Jones, B. L., S. Krishnan, and S. H. Cho. 2010. Estimation of microscopic dose enhancement factor around gold nanoparticles by Monte Carlo calculations. Medical Physics 37(7):3809–3816.

Wang, A. Z. et al. 2010. ChemoRad nanoparticles: A novel multifunctional nanoparticle platform for targeted delivery of concurrent chemoradiation. Nanomedicine (London) 5(3):361–368.

Werner, M. E. et al. 2011. Folate-targeted polymeric nanoparticle formulation of docetaxel is an effective molecularly targeted adiosensitizer with efficacy dependent on the timing of radiotherapy. ACS Nano 5(11):8990–8998.

Kada, T., T. Noguti, and M. Namiki. 1970. Radio-sensitization with iodine compounds. I. Examination of damage in deoxyribonucleic acid with Bacillus subtilis transformation system by irradiation in the presence of potassium iodide. International Journal of Radiation Biology & Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry & Medicine 17(5):407–418.

Kim, I. A. et al. 2010a. HDAC inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization in human carcinoma cells: A general phenomenon? Journal of Radiation Research (Tokyo) 51(3):257–263. #

Kim, J. K. et al. 2010b. Therapeutic application of metallic nanoparticles combined with particle-induced x-ray emission effect. Nanotechnology 21(42):425102.

Kim, J. et al. 2008. Photothermal response of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 40(6):415–421.

Kobayashi, K. et al. 2002. Enhancement of X-ray-induced breaks in DNA bound to molecules containing platinum: A possible application to hadrontherapy. Radiation Research 157(1):32–37.

Le Sech, C. et al. 2000. Strand break induction by photoab- sorption in DNA-bound molecules. Radiation Research 153(4):454–458.

Le Sech, C. et al. 2001. Enhanced strand break induction of DNA by resonant metal-innershell photoabsorption. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 79(2): 196–200.

Lowery, A. et al. 2011. Tumor-targeted delivery of liposome- encapsulated doxorubicin by use of a peptide that selectively binds to irradiated tumors. Journal of Controlled Release 150(1):117–124. Maeda, H. et al. 2003. Vascular permeability enhancement in solid tumor: Various factors, mechanisms involved and its impli- cations. International Immunopharmacology 3(3):319–328.

Furusawa, Y., H. Maezawa, and K. Suzuki. 1991. Enhanced killing effect on 5-bromodeoxyuridine labelled bacteriophage T1 by monoenergetic synchrotron X-ray at the energy of bro- mine K-shell absorption edge. Journal of Radiation Research (Tokyo) 32(1):1–12.

Morgan, M. A. et al. 2010. Mechanism of radiosensitization by the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 involves abrogation of the G checkpoint and inhibition of homologous recombinational DNA repair. Cancer Research 70(12):4972–4981.

Nakamura, H. et al. 2009. Development of boron nanocapsules for neutron capture therapy. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67(7–8 Suppl):S84–S87

Pamujula, S. et al. 2008. Radioprotection in mice following oral administration of WR-1065/PLGA nanoparticles. International Journal of Radiation Biology 84(11):900–908.

Peeters, S. T. et al. 2006. Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Results of the Dutch multicenter ran- domized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24(13):1990–1996.

Roa, W. et al. 2009. Gold nanoparticle sensitize radiotherapy of prostate cancer cells by regulation of the cell cycle. Nanotechnology 20(37):375101.

Robar, J. L. 2006. Generation and modelling of megavoltage photon beams for contrast-enhanced radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 51(21):5487–5504.

Robar, J. L., S. A. Riccio, and M. A. Martin. 2002. Tumour dose enhancement using modified megavoltage photon beams and contrast media. Physics in Medicine and Biology 47(14): 2433–2449.

Santos Mello, R. et al. 1983. Radiation dose enhancement in tumors with iodine. Medical Physics 10(1):75–78.

Schweitzer, A. D. et al. 2010. Melanin-covered nanoparticles for protection of bone marrow during radiation therapy of cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 78(5):1494–1502.

Sofou, S. 2008. Radionuclide carriers for targeting of cancer. International Journal of Nanomedicine 3(2):181–199.

Verhaegen, F. et al. 2005. Dosimetric and microdosimetric study of contrast-enhanced radiotherapy with kilovolt x-rays. Physics in Medicine and Biology 50(15):3555–3569.

Williams, L. E., G. L. DeNardo, and R. F. Meredith. 2008. Targeted radionuclide therapy. Medical Physics 35(7):3062–3068.

Wu, H. et al. 2008. Apoferritin-templated yttrium phosphate nanoparticle conjugates for radioimmunotherapy of cancers. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 8(5):2316–2322.

Che, S. M. et al. 2010. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS398 enhances radiosensitivity of radioresistant esophageal cancer cells by inhibiting AKT activation and inducing apoptosis. Cancer Investigation 28(7):679–688.

Chithrani, D. B. et al. 2010. Gold nanoparticles as radiation sensitizers in cancer therapy. Radiation Research 173(6):719–728.

You, Z. Y. et al. 2010. The radiosensitization effects of Endostar on human lung squamous cancer cells H-520. Cancer Cell International 10(1):17.

Zietman, A. L. et al. 2005. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial. Jama 294(10):1233–1239.

Zou, J. et al. 2009. Inhibition of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated by antisense oligonucleotide nanoparticles induces radiosen-sitization of head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma in mice. Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals 24(3): 339–346.

Authors

Murtada Sameer Sadoon Kazim
Muntadher Ayad Fadhil Thabit
Ahmed Khalil Wadi Abdulla
Khazaal Mhmood Saadoon
Kazim, M. S. S., Thabit, M. A. F., Wadi Abdulla, A. K., & Saadoon, K. M. (2024). Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy Techniques: Cellular Targeted Radiation Therapy with Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitizing Drug Delivery to Tumours and GNRT. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 7(07), 3253–3265. https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2024/7-7-20

Article Details