Morphology Of Gall Bladder- A Cadaveric Study

Dr. Stuti Srivastava (1) , Dr. Abeer Zubair Khan (2)
(1) Assistant Professor, Ananta Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center , India
(2) Assistant Professor, Intergral Institute of Medical Sciences and Reseach , India

Abstract

Aim: To study variations in external morphology of cadaveric gall bladder.


Materials and Methods: This study was undertaken on 30 cadaveric liver and gall bladder specimens in the Department of Anatomy at Tertiary Medical College of West Uttar Pradesh in terms of maximum length, maximum transverse diameter, thickness, shape, external variations and length of gall bladder below the inferior border of the liver using vernier caliper.


Results: Gall bladder had length ranging between 5.52 and 11.32 cm, transverse diameter between 2.78 and 5.57 cm, thickness at neck, body and fundus was not found uniform. The commonest shape observed in this study was pear shaped. The length of gall bladder below the inferior border of liver varied between 0.46 and 3.93 cm.


Conclusion: Since the incidence of gall bladder illness in our country is increasing day by day hence morphological knowledge is essential, not only from the point of biliary disease but also with respect to the various laprascopic, surgical and invasive techniques for example T-tube cholangiogram in the proper diagnosis and management of gall bladder and extrahepatic bile duct diseases. The morphological data may be useful to the surgeon’s radiologists and anatomists.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

References:

[1]. Standring S; Gray's Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis Of Clinical Practice, in Gall Bladder and Biliary tree. 38th Edition. Chapter – 12 .Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, London 1999, 1809 – 1810.

[2]. Chari RS, Shah SA. Biliary system In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL.Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 18thEdition; St. Louis, Mo: WB Saunders; 2007:Chapter – 54; 1474 – 14.

[3]. Hollinshed WH. Anatomy for Surgeons in the Liver and the Gall bladder, 3rd Ed; Vol. 2; Harper and Row, Philadelphia, 1983, 334.

[4]. Turner MA, Fulcher AS. Gore RM, Levine MS. Eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology in Gallbladder and Biliary Tract: Normal Anatomy and Examination Techniques. 2nd ed Vol 2. WB Saunders. Philadelphia, 2000; 1250 – 76.

[5]. Vakili K, Pomfret EA. Biliary anatomy and embryology. Surgical Clin of North America, 2008:88(6); 1159 – 1174.

[6]. Rajguru J, Khare S, Jain S, Ghai R, Singla M, Goel P. Variations In The External Morphology Of Gall Bladder. J. Anat. Soc. India 2012; 61(1) 9 – 12.

[7]. Prakash AV, Panshewdikar Pradnyesh N, Joshi DS, Prakash AA. A cadaveric study involving variations in external morphology of gall bladder. International Journal Of Medical Research &Health Sciences 2013;2(2):239 – 242.

[8]. Moore KL and Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy in Abdomen. 5th edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2006: 302.

[9]. Lischtenstein M, Nicosia AJ.the clinical significance of accessory hepato-biliary ducts. Annals of Surgery.1955; 141 (1):120 – 124.

[10]. Deutsch AA, Englestein D, Cohen M,Kunichevsky M, Reiss R. Septum of the gallbladder, clinical implications and treatment. Postgrad Med J.1986; 62: 453 –56.

[11]. Gore RM, Fulcher AS, Taylor AJ, Ghahremani GG. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology. Anomalies and anatomic variants of the gallbladder and biliary tract. 2nd Edition. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA; 2000; 1305 – 20.

[12]. Meilstrup JW, Hopper KD,Thieme GA Imaging of gallbladder variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Dec;157(6):1205 – 8.

[13]. Futara G, Kinfu Y Anatomical variations of gallbladder and biliary ducts among Ethiopians. Ethiop Med J. 2001 Jul; 39(3):173 – 84.

[14]. Khan LF, Naushaba H, Paul UK, Banik S, Al-Zafri MA. Gross and histomorphological study of thickness of the gallbladder wall. J. Dhaka National Med. Coll. Hos. 2012; 18(1): 34 – 38.

[15]. Carbajo MA, Martin del Orono JC, Balanco JI, CuestaC, Martin F, Toledano M, et al. Congenital malformations of gallbladder and cystic duct diagnosed by laparoscopy: high surgical risk. JSLS 1999; 3: 319 – 21.

[16]. Khamiso Altaf Hussain Talpur et al. Anatomical variations and congenital anomalies of extra hepatic biliary system encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pak Med Assoc; 2010; 60(2): 89 – 93

Authors

Dr. Stuti Srivastava
stutisrivastavaa@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Dr. Abeer Zubair Khan
Srivastava, D. S., & Khan, D. A. Z. . (2019). Morphology Of Gall Bladder- A Cadaveric Study. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2(10), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.15520/jcmro.v2i10.217
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details