A Cross Sectional Study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing Different Factors between Lean Body Weight, Non Obese and Obese Patients in Western Uttar Pradesh
Abstract
Introduction- Incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been increased quite rapidly from last decade. It was thought previously that obesity is one of the major predisposing risk factor and complications of diabetes would be more common and fatal in obese persons with diabetes, but it has been shown in more recent studies that some of the factors and peculiarities are much more common in patients with lean body mass.
Material and methods- This study was done in a tertiary care centre of western Uttar Pradesh over 240 cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus that were divided into three categories in equal proportion considering their body mass index (lean , non obese and obese ). Some of the factors like urine microscopy, fasting and post prandial glucose level, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile and kidney functions were studied to find out the difference in level of above mentioned factors in these groups.
Results- Fasting blood glucose, post prandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and triglyceride level came to be signinifiacntly higher in lean body mass group as compared to other two groups. As far as renal status is concerned there was no significant variation in different groups of diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion- Present study showed that lean body weight type of type 2 diabetes mellitus are definitely different subset of population of type 2 diabetes mellitus with clinical characteristics different from other subtype i.e. non obese and obese in this region of country. Â
Introduction- Incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been increased quite rapidly from last decade. It was thought previously that obesity is one of the major predisposing risk factor and complications of diabetes would be more common and fatal in obese persons with diabetes, but it has been shown in more recent studies that some of the factors and peculiarities are much more common in patients with lean body mass.
Material and methods- This study was done in a tertiary care centre of western Uttar Pradesh over 240 cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus that were divided into three categories in equal proportion considering their body mass index (lean , non obese and obese ). Some of the factors like urine microscopy, fasting and post prandial glucose level, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile and kidney functions were studied to find out the difference in level of above mentioned factors in these groups.
Results- Fasting blood glucose, post prandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and triglyceride level came to be signinifiacntly higher in lean body mass group as compared to other two groups. As far as renal status is concerned there was no significant variation in different groups of diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion- Present study showed that lean body weight type of type 2 diabetes mellitus are definitely different subset of population of type 2 diabetes mellitus with clinical characteristics different from other subtype i.e. non obese and obese in this region of country. Â
Introduction- Incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been increased quite rapidly from last decade. It was thought previously that obesity is one of the major predisposing risk factor and complications of diabetes would be more common and fatal in obese persons with diabetes, but it has been shown in more recent studies that some of the factors and peculiarities are much more common in patients with lean body mass.
Material and methods- This study was done in a tertiary care centre of western Uttar Pradesh over 240 cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus that were divided into three categories in equal proportion considering their body mass index (lean , non obese and obese ). Some of the factors like urine microscopy, fasting and post prandial glucose level, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile and kidney functions were studied to find out the difference in level of above mentioned factors in these groups.
Results- Fasting blood glucose, post prandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and triglyceride level came to be signinifiacntly higher in lean body mass group as compared to other two groups. As far as renal status is concerned there was no significant variation in different groups of diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion- Present study showed that lean body weight type of type 2 diabetes mellitus are definitely different subset of population of type 2 diabetes mellitus with clinical characteristics different from other subtype i.e. non obese and obese in this region of country. Â
Full text article
References
2. Tripathy BB, Kar BC. Observations and clinical patterns of diabetes in India. Diabetes 1965;14:404-12.
3. Samal KC, Das S, Agarwal BN, Panda NC, Tripathy BB. Nutritional status and profile of NIDDM of recent onset. J Diab Assoc India,. 1998;28:99-101.
4. Ramchandran A , Snehalatha C, Latha E , Vijay V, Vishwanathan M. Rising prevalence of NIDDM in urban population in India. Diabetologia. 1997;40:232-7.
5. Mohan V, Vijayaprabha R, Rema M, premalatha G, Poongothai S, Deepa R et al. clinical profile of lean NIDDM in south India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;38:101-8.
6. Zheng W, McLerran DF Rolland B, Zhang X, Inouse M, Matsuo K, He J, Gupta PC, Ramdas K, Tsugane S et al. Association between body mass index and risk of death in more than 1 million Asians. N Engl J Med. 2011;363:719-29.
7. Manson JE, Willett WC, Stamfer MJ, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:677-85.
8. Pishon T, Boeing H, Hoffemann K, B ergmann M, Schulze MB, Overvad K, Van der Schouw YT, Spencer E, Moons KG, Tjonneland A. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of deathy in Europe. N Engl J Med.2008;359:2105-120.
9. Manson JE, Stamfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Willet WC. Body weight and longevity. A Reassesment. JAMA. 1987;257:353-58.
10. FloerzH, Castillo-Floerz S. Beyond the obesity paradox in diabetes: fitness, fatness and mortality. JAMA.2012;308:619-20.
11. Zamboni M, Maxzzali G, Zoico E, Harris TB, Meigs JB,Di Francesco V, Fantin F, Bissoli L, Bosello O. HJealth consequences of obesity in the elderly: a review of four unresolved questions. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29:1011-29.
12.Yagnik CS et al . Aossiacition of obesity with clinical, biochemical, metabolic and endocrine measurement in newly diagnosed NIDDM patients- NovoNordisk Diabetes update. Kapur A Ed. 1993, Proceedings Health care communication 139-46.
13. Das S, Samuel SC, Baliarsinha AK, Tripathy BB. Lean (underweight) NIDDM- Peculiarities and differences in metabolic and hormonal status- A pilot study. J A ssc Physicians India. 1995;43:339-42.
14. Seshaiah Vet al: Lipid profile and other risk factors associated with vascular complications in NIDDM- Lipid India ILIB Oct-Dec 1996 :10-15.
15. Das Siddharta: Lean NIDDM: An independent entity-in Novonordisk Diabetes updates proceedings Ed. Kapur A. Health Care Communication; Bombay 1993:153-9.