Short-term neonatal outcome in routine use of painless delivery: a retrospective study

Tripaldi Clelia (1)
(1) UOSVD , Italy

Abstract

The painless delivery, recently included among the essential levels of care, is an application of epidural analgesia to the last stage of labor which may greatly improve the quality of childbirth experience. This technique is poorly used in Italy, because of the lack of information in the population, disruption of services and scarcity of economic resources. There are not many retrospective studies quantifying the use of this technique in recent years, nor clinical indicators highlighting any adverse event from the neonatal point of view. We describe the ten-year experience of a birth point belonging to a peripheral hospital, comparing two populations of neonates born in the same center in two different periods, in order to determine whether the routine use of analgesia in labor can influence the short-term neonatal outcome. We examined the basic data regarding all neonates born in the years 2004 and 2014. In 2004 the painless delivery was not yet used in our center, while in 2014 it was used routinely in every spontaneous birth. We examined data obtained retrospectively from the paper files of the delivery room and neonatal ones. The two populations of infants examined were comparable for baseline characteristics, such as full-term pregnancy, absence of obstetric risk factors and similar operative protocols for emergency caesarean section indications. For every baby the type of delivery, the Apgar score, the transfer rate in the neonatal intensive care unit and eventual death were marked. The analyzed data confirm that there are no statistically significant differences in short-term neonatal outcome between the two groups of infants.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Tripaldi Clelia
clelia.tripaldi@libero.it (Primary Contact)
Clelia, T. (2017). Short-term neonatal outcome in routine use of painless delivery: a retrospective study. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15520/jcmro.v1i1.2
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details